MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/related; boundary="----=_NextPart_01C8A3FB.955DA440" This document is a Single File Web Page, also known as a Web Archive file. If you are seeing this message, your browser or editor doesn't support Web Archive files. Please download a browser that supports Web Archive, such as Microsoft Internet Explorer. ------=_NextPart_01C8A3FB.955DA440 Content-Location: file:///C:/D1396912/Antiabortionzealotsgraspforpower.htm Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Anti-Abortion Zealots’ Grasp for Power

Anti-Abortion Zealots’ Grasp= for Power

By Warre= n M. Hern

&nb= sp;

Rocky Mountain News                 =              =          =                           SPEAKOUT                 =             &nb= sp;            =                =         Monday, Dec= ember 19, 1994

 

     The thoughtful comments by Douglass Groothuis in= his Dec. 7 Speakout “Pro-lifers face defining moment,” urging adversaries of abortion to be non-violent in their opposition, is a welcome attempt to inject peaceful dialogue into the otherwise insane zealotry of t= he anti-abortion movement.  Unfortunately, Groothuis’ essay reveals some of the roots of t= his insoluble conflict.

     While I would st= rongly encourage would-be anti-abortion assassins to read Groothuis’ plea for reason and civility, it contains echoes of the rhetoric that ha made assassination of physicians who do abortions seem an attractive strategy to some of Groothuis’ more militant colleagues.

     Groothuis refers= to physicians who perform abortions as “abortionists,” a degrading= and demeaning term that carries with it a history of sordid, illegal activities conducted by unscrupulous and incompetent criminals on terrified women.

     “Abortionist” is not a neutral term, and it purposefully degrades and dehumanizes those to whom it is applied.  It has the same negative connotati= ons as the most despicable racial epithet, and it is for that reason that the anti-abortion movement uses “abortionist” to describe physicians who help women who seek their assistance.

     The term “pro-life,” by contrast, linguistically commandeers the moral h= igh ground by implying that those who believe in freedom of choice in abortion = are “anti-life” or “pro-death.”  Nothing could be further from the = truth, and the anti-abortion zealots know it.&nbs= p; It is also an outright lie, because what we live with today is the directive from some members of the anti-abortion movement that: “Do w= hat we tell you to do or we will kill you.”  There is nothing pro-life about th= at.

     At least two physicians have been assassinated, two others have been shot in assassinati= on attempts, and other clinic workers have been critically wounded.  The rest of us live in fear.<= /o:p>

     Groothuis’= essay implies that he and his colleagues have a monopoly on concern for “life.”  This deni= es that there is a legitimate concern for the life of the woman whose health or very being is threatened by pregnancy, a condition that male priests cannot suffer, and which can kill women, even when it is welcome.

     While Groothuis = speaks of “abortion on demand,” it doesn’t exist.  But the term implies that there is= no thought process involved in obtaining or providing an abortion for a woman = who needs one.  This is a lie.

     The ideas that “human life begins at conception” and that the embryo is an “unborn” or “pre-born child” are preposterous (I ho= pe no one decides I am a “pre-dead corpse” and tries to bury me).<= span style=3D'mso-spacerun:yes'>   Human life began hundreds of thousands of years ago and has continued in an unbroken sequence ever since= .

     The question is = not when human life begins, but who is best prepared to make the decision to transmit life to a new generation: the individual or the state?   In this arena, the individual woman is more competent than any government.

     Anti-abortion ze= alots would nonetheless use the coercive power of the state to prevent all abortions.  This would deprive= women of an essential component of women’s health care which has lowered maternal mortality rates.

     Therein lies the= rub: Anti-abortion zealots care nothing for the health and welfare of women; what they care about is not fetuses or even life, but power.  That is why the murders of physici= ans who perform abortions are political assassinations.  The physicians represent what the assassins hate: freedom.

     Advocates of pea= ceful persuasion like Groothuis notwithstanding, the anti-abortion movement is now most clearly represented by thugs whose purpose is to inflict pain, terror,= and tyranny.  “Know ye a tre= e by its fruit.”

    Warren M. Hern, M.D. is director of the Boulder Abortion Clinic

 

For further information a= nd commentary by Warren M. Hern, go to www.= drhern.com > News and publications

------=_NextPart_01C8A3FB.955DA440 Content-Location: file:///C:/D1396912/Antiabortionzealotsgraspforpower_files/header.htm Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii"





PAGE=  

 

PAGE=   2

 

------=_NextPart_01C8A3FB.955DA440 Content-Location: file:///C:/D1396912/Antiabortionzealotsgraspforpower_files/filelist.xml Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/xml; charset="utf-8" ------=_NextPart_01C8A3FB.955DA440--